Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could be proven:
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
++(nil, y) → y
++(x, nil) → x
++(.(x, y), z) → .(x, ++(y, z))
++(++(x, y), z) → ++(x, ++(y, z))
Q is empty.
↳ QTRS
↳ DirectTerminationProof
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
++(nil, y) → y
++(x, nil) → x
++(.(x, y), z) → .(x, ++(y, z))
++(++(x, y), z) → ++(x, ++(y, z))
Q is empty.
We use [23] with the following order to prove termination.
Recursive path order with status [2].
Quasi-Precedence:
nil > [++2, .2]
Status: ++2: [1,2]
nil: multiset
.2: [1,2]